Home PageHome Page


Join Our Plan for the Nortel Terminated Employees to Gain Leverage in the CCAA Proceedings

Media/Press

 

1) Our firm [Juroviesky and Ricci LLP] has prepared a comprehensive, unique and cutting edge plan on how to maximize your recovery of termination and severance pay in the Nortel CCAA proceedings. No other firm is doing that for you.

2) We take no fees from you. We hope to obtain a representation order to protect the legal rights of Nortel terminated employees. We are willing to do our work for you on complete contingency. Contingency means that we only get paid upon and from recovery of monies on your behalf.

3) We need to file motion materials soon to protect your legal rights at the April 20th CCAA hearing.

4) You can learn more about our legal plan by attending the webinar on Monday March 16th, 3:00 PM EDT.

If you think we have the best plan to represent the Nortel terminated employees signup at our website or email us:

Henry Juroviesky, Barrister and Solicitor
Juroviesky and Ricci LLP
(Foreign Legal Consultants, Authorized to Practice U.S. Law)
Suite 904, 4950 Yonge Street,
Toronto, Ontario M2N 6K1
416.646.7877 (Direct Dial)
416.481.1792 (Fax)
hjuroviesky@jruslaw.com

http://www.jruslaw.com/NortelCCAA

The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) provides flexibility for debtors and creditors to work out their respective interests in the face of a company’s pending bankruptcy. This allows the debtors and creditors to reach an agreed upon plan of compromise as an alternative to bankruptcy. Generally, the creditor groups that have the most votes control the proceedings. The vote may occur with all creditors in one omnibus class, or there may be separate votes taken within separate creditor classes. Each class vote is two-part in nature: i) by dollar value, and ii) headcount. For example, a compromise plan under the CCAA will only be passed if 2/3 of creditors' dollar value and 50.1% of the creditors' headcount approve the plan. This is an “and” test in the sense that plan approval requires both 2/3 of the dollar value, as well as the majority of the creditors' headcount. Where the CCAA judge determines that there should be separate class votes, then any one separate class can cause the CCAA compromise plan to fail by insufficient yes headcount and dollar value votes within their separate class.

Nortel management, and some law firms friendly to Nortel and its large creditors, want you to believe that you have no power to get more than your pro-rata share of cash proceeds for your termination and severance pay in the CCAA proceedings. We feel it is imperative that you know this information is inaccurate. We estimate that the Nortel terminated Canadian employees are owed a minute 1% of the total value owed to all Nortel creditors. On the other hand, it is likely there are 1,100 Nortel terminated Canadian employees and this headcount exceeds the 50.1% headcount needed for approval of the Nortel restructuring plan. This headcount majority gives the terminated Canadian employees group leverage to achieve more than its pro- rata share of the value taken by the unsecured creditors, even achieving payment in full.

As terminated employees, you did not have the opportunity to assess the creditworthiness of Nortel, like the secured and unsecured creditors are expected to do before extending credit. The creditors are generally sophisticated investors or corporate suppliers, where bankruptcies and compromises are an expected risk. The terminated employees are unable to recover their damages, like the unsecured creditors can from future business opportunities with Nortel.

The pension fund members have a contingent liability in the future, but there are strong prospects for asset market value recovery and additional contributions from the ongoing restructured company. Also, the payment of termination and severance pay has strong benefits for the ongoing restructured company in terms of higher morale, lower turnover and increased effectiveness of active employees to make the ongoing restructured company successful in the future. Finally, the payment of the termination and severance pay claims will by no means adversely affect Nortel's ability to obtain successful restructuring within CCAA, since the severance dollar amount is likely only 1% of the total dollar value of credit being voted.

In our role as counsel for the retail noteholders of Non-Bank Asset Backed Commercial Paper, we represented less than 1% of the dollar value interest in the CCAA proceedings. Nonetheless, we were able to take advantage of our class having a headcount greater than the 50.1% needed in the omnibus class for approval of the compromise plan. This enabled our group to control the direction of the proceedings and the terms of the compromise plan. This resulted in one-hundred cents on the dollar recovery for the class, plus accrued interest and legal costs.

We are of the opinion, that the Nortel terminated Canadian employees should be removed from the unsecured creditor class and should formulate its own class for the purpose of voting due to recent termination pay and severance pay law amendments. So even if the CCAA judge decides to permit the Nortel pension fund members or the post retirement health beneficiaries to make individual votes on the compromise plan, the terminated employees' separate class can still stop the restructuring plan by indicating its intentions to vote no until a satisfactory cash offer is made for its claims.

 

Learn More About Our CCAA Plan by viewing our previously recorded Webinars

Henry Juroviesky and independent financial analyst, Diane Urquhart, have hosted a number of webinars to update you on the Juroviesky and Ricci LLP plan to accelerate and maximize the recovery of the termination and severance pay of Terminated/Severed Nortel Canadian Employees and to facilitate the creation of additional value for the Nortel estate.

The webinars can be viewed by visiting the following links:

**Note that the members of the Juroviesky and Ricci LLP Nortel Steering Committee are (1) Michael McCorkle; (2) Harvey Stein; (3) Paul Caldwell; and (4) Marie Lunney.